Q. Is this policypurely looking at the technical side of the sector, or licensing of those selling cars and running dealerships too?
At present we are only talking about people who work on cars. However we believe this will have a knock on effect, particularly in the used car sales arena, as customers will be able to check if the car has been serviced by a licensed technician. Our primary focus is on the safety issues around repairing modern vehicles and on ensuring that technicians are rewarded for undertaking proper training rather than being forced to compete on cost with those who do not.
Q. Is it an admission that the IMI Accreditation (formerly ATA) scheme introduced by the IMI several years ago has had limited impact on the industry. What has IMI Accreditation achieved?
A. IMI Accreditation was developed at the behest of government, who wanted the sector to self regulate rather than imposing a scheme on us at the time. It has been very successful in gaining the support of both franchise dealers and independent garages. It has also seen consumer awareness resurgence thanks to the launch of the IMI Professional Register, which has IMI Accreditation at its heart as a way people can check the competency of technicians alongside IMI Membership.
However, we do not believe this has gone far enough as we are still in a situation where you don’t have to train to operate and where poor operators are still harming consumer confidence. With the speed of development of modern technology, the race to the bottom a lack of regulation encourages is simply unsustainable and indeed dangerous in the long run.
What IMI Accreditation has provided us with is an excellent, readymade, solution to licensing based on competency checks and tied closely to the curriculums of recognized industry qualifications. Along with the IMI Professional Register adding a layer of transparency, ATA, in its new guise as IMI Accreditation, can naturally evolve into a license to practice with little cost to the sector, but plenty of benefit.
Q. Why should franchised dealers want licensing, when they already have to comply with their relatively stringent manufacturer standards? Doesn’t it simply mean more cost/red tape for them?
In reality, in the licensing system we are proposing, most franchised dealers would already be meeting the requirements because of the formalized training programmers they engage with - so it adds very little red tape to them. Many manufacturer programs also use IMI qualifications or are quality assured by the IMI, allowing us to tie them directly into the competency requirements for the professional register and, by extension, a license.
Also, bear in mind that IMI Accreditation and the industry wide qualifications developed by the IMI are developed in close consultation with the industry, so many manufacturers with whom franchised dealers work with on their training have built their programs around the requirements we think are needed for licensing.
Generally speaking, the feedback we have received from this arena has suggested that many would welcome the opportunity to demonstrate the high standards they have to consumers. Just like all businesses who service cars, Franchise Dealers are in the situation where they are competing on cost with business with little or no investment in training and also suffer from the same negative perceptions held by some members of the public.
Q. What would licensing mean for motor industry individuals/firms who failed to comply? Is the aim to drive the shoddy ones out of the industry?
Put simply we want to see an end to the situation where literally anyone can set up a business to work on cars. This situation is not fair to those people who take pride in their work and invest in their business and not safe for motorists. The aim is to have a situation where you can’t run a vehicle servicing business without proving the competency of your staff to do so. This would hand the advantage to the best businesses and force the poor ones either to catch up or perish.
If you have a question relating to the campaign please send it to comms@theimi.org.uk